As a society, we can’t help but put people in (figurative) boxes. Once we think we know someone, we immediately guess at the things they would and would not do. But people have a way of surprising you, especially shy, passive people who haven’t had the courage or opportunity to break out of their shells.
Author Marianne C. Bohr presents a fish out of water story in which the fish who yearned for a new environment thrives in it in her book, When Paris Whispers. Below is my review of When Paris Whispers followed by an interview with Bohr. Be sure to enter to win a copy via the SweepWidget form below!
When Paris Whispers plot summary
In the spring of 1981, Catrine “Cat” Gray leaves her home with her domineering, widowed mother in Virginia and arrives in Paris, France, a places she has longed to visit. Cat is set up to live with her close friend, Freddie Forestier, a spoiled party girl with a domineering personality and an explosive temper.
When a long bubbling and violent fight erupts between the two roommates and terminates their friendship, Cat finds herself on her own, desperately seeking work in order to stay in Paris by any means necessary. By chance, Cat meets a crotchety old widow, Madame Arnoux, and strikes up an unlikely friendship which becomes the saving grace she needs to stay in Paris, create a found family, and finally start her life.
The story
When Paris Whispers is an exquisite coming of age, fish out of water, living abroad tale that defies expectations, is full of clear, strong imagery and messages, and is packed with story, characterization, and fascinating themes. This story flows in unexpected and exciting ways, and the reader comes along for the ride. Bohr expertly paints a very intimate portrayal of Paris, including its food, culture, and scenery, from the eyes of the protagonist who loves the real version of the city as much as the version she has always fantasized about.
Though set in the early 80s, the plot doesn’t lean on period-specific references, winks, or nostalgia to help it along. Instead, it helps to create a sense of isolation and independence created by its technology and Cat’s personality and monetary limitations. It allows Cat to pull herself up by her bootstraps just to prove to herself and those who would doubt her that she can live the life she wants.
Bohr never talks down to the audience, but she never leaves them behind either. I appreciated how every French line or reference was spelled out in order to help the casual reader keep up. There were also no hokey tropes or the usual famous destinations used to depict the city. Cat was there to immerse herself in the local culture, not the touristy one, and this gave her and her story depth and credibility.
The characters
Cat is immediately likable and well rounded. She has lived a sheltered life, and it’s brave of her to be pursuing her dream of living in Paris. At the same time, she’s self-sufficient and levelheaded. She longs for company but doesn’t lean on it as a crutch to give into those who domineer her.
Also worked into the plot’s conflict is a love story that heightens Cat’s experience without overtaking it. As she crushes on Cat’s cousin, Vincent, we root for her to pursue a relationship with him, and we sympathize for her longing for him and his company, particularly once she sets out on her own.
Still, Vincent is not Cat’s number one priority, especially when she has her basic needs to worry about first. She also doesn’t look to him to save her from her predicament, and he doesn’t. He’s the perfect balance of support for her.
My favorite relationship, though, is that between Cat and Madame Arnoux. She’s like Judi Dench’s character in Chocolat, bitter and biting but ultimately kind and in need of companionship as much as Cat. The two compliment each other. Cat softens Madame while Madame fluffs up Cat’s confidence. Between Freddie and her mother, Cat is used to dealing with harsh women, but there’s never that underlying kindness beneath it that Madame exudes.
The tone
I love Cat’s growth throughout the book and how it’s used to stamp down the tension that builds in the first half of the story, first in dealing with Freddie and the brutal calls home to her mom, and then in the race to cement herself into the city with a job before her funds run out.
When Cat’s luck starts to change, it feels like coasting down a hill that we never thought we’d make it to the top of. Then, Bohr throws us for a loop by revealing a shocking truth about Cat’s family history that puts so much into perspective and finally leads to some long overdue truces.
The message
When Paris Whispers is a satisfying story that feels real and romanticized at the same time. It shows how risks pay off, how people can surprise themselves and everyone around them, and how we shouldn’t always blame ourselves for the way people treat us.
My recommendation
I recommend When Paris Whispers to those looking for a deep, well-paced, and detailed travel story that blends several formulaic plotlines to create a unique and refreshing story about coming into your own and living life on your terms. The ending is satisfying. Not squeaky clean but as messy as life is and as rewarding as it can be under the right circumstances.
My rating
Enter the giveaway!
An interview with Marianne C. Bohr
How did you come up with the title of this book? What did you want it to convey to the reader?
Titles can be so difficult. I went through so many possibilities with my publisher, Melissa Carrigee at Brother Mockingbird, before we landed on this one. It wasn’t a flash of inspiration— it was a process, going back and forth, testing different combinations, until When Paris Whispers finally felt right.
I knew “Paris” had to be in there from the start. Aside from my own love of the city, readers actively search for books set there. It’s a location people seek out on purpose. So that word was non-negotiable.
“Whispers” took longer to earn its place, but it was the right choice because it’s literal, not metaphorical. Catrine actually hears voices. The literary and artistic world of France speak to her as she moves through Paris and the voices become her spiritual advisers. That’s central to who she becomes in the book, so the title needed to reflect it honestly rather than dress it up as a figure of speech.
Once we had both pieces, When Paris Whispers did what I’d hoped. It promises a real, specific place, and it tells the reader something true about what’s waiting for them. Catrine doesn’t just visit Paris, she hears it.
Why did you decide to set the story in the 1980s? How did it influence or challenge the writing of the book?
I set When Paris Whispers in 1981 partly because I lived in France around that time myself, and I knew that history would let me bring the era to life with real authenticity. The small details like what the cafés smelled like, what the streets sounded like, what it felt like to be a young woman finding her way in a foreign city—those weren’t things I had to research because I’d lived them. That kind of lived-in detail is hard to fake, and I wanted readers to feel like they were there, not just reading a postcard version of Paris.
But the era mattered for more than nostalgia. I needed Catrine to be genuinely alone, cut off from home in a way that’s almost impossible to imagine now. No cellphone to call her mother or for her mother to call her. No text to check in with a friend. No email to soften the distance.
In 1981, if you wanted to reach someone back home, you wrote a letter and waited, or you found a payphone and hoped you had the right coins. That isolation was essential to who Catrine becomes in this book. She has to face Paris and the voices she hears there alone.
There was a craft reason too, and I’ll admit it was a relief: setting the book in 1981 meant I didn’t have to wrestle with how cellphones and texting reshape modern plotting. So much contemporary fiction must account for the fact that characters can just call or text their way out of confusion or danger or misunderstandings. It changes pacing, tension, and how mysteries unfold. Setting the story in a pre-cellphone era let me write suspense and isolation the old-fashioned way, without a smartphone solving problems three chapters too early.
Did you do any research before or while writing the book?
I did, though not in the way people might expect for a novel set somewhere I know well. The truth is, I’ve been to every real-life place in this book. I could already imagine Paris, Rouen and Étretat because I’ve walked them. But memory is a funny thing, and I found myself constantly double-checking things.
Google Maps was a godsend. I’d remember a street, a turn, or the general feel of a neighborhood, but I needed to confirm exact distances, how long it would take Catrine to walk from the Montparnasse Cemetery to La Rotonde, whether the Boulevard Saint Germain actually connected to the street I thought it did.
Fiction lives or dies on small details like that, and a reader who knows Paris will notice if a walk that should take ten minutes is written as if it takes two. I’m hoping I got all those specifics right.
I also turned to the internet for historical accuracy, like specific dates, events, the kind of details that needed to be right rather than remembered. It’s one thing to recall what a café felt like in 1981. It’s another to be sure you have the correct date for something that actually happened that year. I wanted readers who know the era, and know Paris and Normandy, and to feel like they were in genuine hands.
So, in a sense, the research wasn’t about discovering something new. It was more about verifying what I already carried with me, making sure my memory and the facts lined up before I trusted them to the page.
Did you plot the story out in advance, or did it develop as you wrote? Did you follow your usual writing process, or did you have to develop any new processes?
I’m much more a pantser than a plotter. I don’t outline scene by scene or map out every beat in advance. But I didn’t go in completely blind, either. I started with a general sense of how the story would unfurl, and I always knew exactly how it would end. That ending was fixed in my mind from the beginning; the real work was figuring out how to get Catrine there.
Some characters arrived fully formed. Catrine, her mother, and Freddie were the three I knew intimately from the start: their voices, their wounds, what they wanted and what they were afraid of.
The others revealed themselves as I wrote, and the Odette character completely surprised me. She popped up out of nowhere. But I’d discover a character’s role, sometimes even their importance to the plot, only once they showed up on the page and I started writing them into a scene.
The story explores four of Catrine’s very different relationships with the other female characters in the book: her mother, Freddie, Madame Arnoux, and Odette. Which of these relationships was the most fun to write? Which one was the most difficult?
Freddie was, hands down, the most fun to write. I loved her and hated her at the same time, sometimes in the same scene. I think most villains have a soft side if you’re willing to look hard enough for it, and finding Freddie’s (her weight embarrassed her and her mother) was one of the real pleasures of writing this book. I wanted her to be genuinely unlikable without ever letting her flatten into a simple bad guy.
Madame Arnoux was the most difficult, for two reasons. First, she changes gradually over the course of the book, and I had to consciously slow myself down so that growth felt earned rather than rushed. It’s tempting to let a character arrive at who they’re becoming too quickly, and I had to resist that with her.
Second, I found her genuinely funny, and humor isn’t where I’m naturally strongest as a writer. Getting her comic timing right on the page took a lot of care There’s a moment when Catrine tells her she looks nice, and Madame fires back, “What? I didn’t look nice yesterday?” That kind of quick, dry wit was a real stretch for me.
Catrine’s mother was, by design, a more one-dimensional character. I’ve known several women like her in real life, and there’s a version of that figure I think a lot of readers will recognize. But even she needed a crack in the armor. There’s a point in the book where I had to let her be vulnerable and understandable, so she wouldn’t just be a type.
And then there’s Odette, who really did come out of nowhere. She wasn’t part of my early sense of the story at all. She arrived as I was writing and ended up feeling like so many friends I’ve had over the years. Of all four women, she’s the one who surprised me the most.
If you could jump into one chapter of the story, which one would it be, and how would you interact with the characters?
That’s a tough one. I don’t want to give too much away, but I think I’d choose the beach scene at Étretat. It’s the moment Catrine first realizes she’s not like the others around her, except for Vincent and Odette, and there’s something about that scene that I find myself returning to even now.
I imagine I’d be an outsider too, despite my best efforts to fit in, much like Catrine herself. So, I’d probably sit down right next to her, and we’d talk about de Beauvoir and what it really means to choose your own life, about Cézanne and the way he kept returning to the same mountain until he found something true in it, and all the other things that make the rest of the group feel a world away. I think I’d be content to mostly ignore everyone else.
And then, if I’m allowed to keep imagining, Vincent and Odette would wander over and join us, Vincent with a bottle of champagne, Odette with Brie sandwiches, and for a little while, the four of us would just be there together, on that beach, talking about things that matter.
Who do you most want to read the book? What do you want readers to take away from the story?
There are a few readers I’d love to find this book, in this general order. First, anyone who’s been to Paris, Normandy, or anywhere in France. I want them to recognize the places, the tastes, the smells, and feel that little jolt of “I’ve been there” as they read. That recognition is one of my favorite things about reading books set somewhere I know, and I hope I’ve given that gift to readers who share my love of France.
After that, I’d like to reach Francophiles who haven’t made it to France yet but long to—readers who already carry the dream of it, even without the concrete memories. Maybe college students who are planning to travel there soon.
And right alongside them, armchair travelers—people who love to travel through books and stories, who’d rather explore a place on the page than ever actually go. I think there’s room in this book for all three kinds of readers, even though they’re coming to it from different places.
And if there’s one thing I hope every reader takes away, regardless of their relationship to France, it’s this: following your passions is key to a well-lived life. Catrine dreamed of going to France since she was a little girl, and despite her mother, despite her lack of funds, despite her fear, she went.
Don’t let anyone tell you no, you can’t do that, you can’t go there, you can’t follow what means the most to you. If this book does nothing else, I hope it gives readers permission to chase the things they love.
Have you thought about what happens to any of the characters after the events of the book end? Any plans for a sequel?
I have thought about it, especially in those first weeks right after I finished the novel. It was a strange period when the characters kept talking to me even though the book was technically done. But I do have some rough plans for a sequel, so I’d rather not spoil any surprises here.
What I will say is that Catrine remains in France, though not necessarily in Paris. There’s a version of her life that doesn’t fit inside Paris alone, and I think that’s the version I’m most excited to write next.
Buy it!
Buy a copy of When Paris Whispers here, and help support local bookstores!
This is an affiliate link, and I will earn a commission on any sales.
Pin it to Pinterest!
